Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Widget HTML #1

[Download] "William H. Tracy and John B. Balestier, Plaintiffs in Error v. Samuel Swartwout" by United States Supreme Court ~ eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free

William H. Tracy and John B. Balestier, Plaintiffs in Error v. Samuel Swartwout

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: William H. Tracy and John B. Balestier, Plaintiffs in Error v. Samuel Swartwout
  • Author : United States Supreme Court
  • Release Date : January 01, 1836
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 86 KB

Description

The collector said he had instructions from the department not to permit the entry at less than three cents per pound. The witness adds, 'he said he would permit the entry at fifteen per cent. ad valorem, but should require bonds at three cents per pound.' Some time after this, Balestier, one of the plaintiffs, arrived in this country, and he went to the collector in company with the witness, E. A. Weeks, and then delivered him the letter set out in the bill of exceptions, making an offer of bonds at fifteen per cent. ad valorem, inquiring whether a formal tender of a bond or bonds as aforesaid was required. He exhibited the bills of lading, invoices, &c. The collector said 'he could not act, he could not permit him to enter the goods upon the terms and at the rate of duty mentioned in the letter, because it was contrary to instructions from the department.' 'The collector did not refuse an entry to be made, but insisted that the goods should pay a higher rate of duty.' It appeared that the duties demanded were equal, if not greater than the value of the goods; the consignee would not bond them, and plaintiffs offered to prove that they were unable to furnish bonds at the rate demanded by the collector. The goods were put in a public store, and remained there a long time; they were finally delivered to the plaintiffs on their bonds, at the rate of fifteen per cent. ad valorem. 'The department' having in the mean time changed its views of the law of July 14, 1832. Sec. 17After the foregoing evidence had been given, the plaintiffs procured several witnesses to prove that the sirup was worth from eight to ten cents per gallon less, when given up by the collector, than when the bonds were offered, in consequence of necessarily growing acid by standing.


Free PDF Download "William H. Tracy and John B. Balestier, Plaintiffs in Error v. Samuel Swartwout" Online ePub Kindle